Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay

Utami Dewi
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v2i2.26

Abstract


Peer feedback is the comment or advice from equal partner, which can help the writer to improve their product of the writing. The aim of this study was to find out the types of peer feedback most frequently given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay. The total participants of this study were 178 students of English education department. The data of this study was taken from peer feedback given by students in reviewing essay, which applied in the class of writing. The design of this study was descriptive quantitative. The peer feedback given by students in reviewing their classmates’ essay was analyzed and categorized based on Hyland and Hyland’s classification: praise, criticism, and suggestion. As the result, suggestion was most frequently given by students in reviewing essay because most of the students gave constructive comment or asking the improvement as their feedback rather than gave praise and criticism. It was seen that the total suggestion which given by students to the classmates was 208 feedback. Then, 108 praise was given which expressed the positive comments or positive impression, though there is some empty praise without constructive comments. 107 criticisms were also given by students in expressing their negative comment or dissatisfaction with the essay written by their classmates. In addition, some combinations of the feedback were also given in reviewing essay.  There are 30 combinations of praise and criticism, 51 combinations of praise and suggestion, and 25 combinations of criticism and suggestion. In conclusion, the reviewers expressed positive and negative comments, positive and constructive comments, the negative and constructive comments in same time.

Keywords


Peer Feedback; Reviewing; Essay

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cai L, et al. (2011) Acetyl-CoA induces cell growth and proliferation by promoting the acetylation of histones at growth genes. Mol Cell 42(4):426-37

Caulk, N. 1994. Comparing teacher and students responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (1). 181-188. Doi:102307/3587209

Cardelle, M., & Corno, L. (1981). Effects on second language learning of variations in written feedback on homework assignments. TESOL Quarterly, 15 (3), 251–261.

CHENG, W, & WARREN, M. (1996) I-long Kong students' attitudes towards peer assessment on English language courses, Asian Journal 0/ English Language Teaching, 6, pp 61-75

Gieve, S. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s ‘‘A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL.’’ TESOL Quarterly, 32, 123–129.

Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.

Hansen, J., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59, 31–38.

Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 91, 20– 44.

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Testing Research, 4, 33–54.

Hyland, K. (2000a). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism inwritten feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212.

Hyland, K. &. Hyland F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Sources. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, G. (1987). First experiences with peer feedback on compositions: Student and teacher reaction. System, 15(3), 325–333.

Krashen, Stephen. (1982). Principles and practice in second language learning and acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43.

Mangelsdorl, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46, 274-284.

McMurry, A. I. (2004). Preparing students for peer review. Unpublished master’s project. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.

Mendonça, C. & Johnson, K. E. “Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction.” TESOL Quarterly 28 (4): 745-69, 1994.

Mittan, R. “The peer review process: harnessing students’ communicative power.” In D. Johnson and D. Roen (eds.), Richness in writing: empowering ESL students : 207- 19, New York: Longman, 1989.

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289.

Thompson, C. (2002). Teaching critical thinking in EAP courses in Australia. TESOL Journal, 11, 15–20.

Topping, KJ (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.

Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefi t from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170.

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.



StatisticsArticle Metrics


This article has been read : 22 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 9 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SALTeL Journal is abstracted and indexed in

           

 

Creative Commons License
SALTeL Journal. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.