Requesting and Refusing Politeness Expression Teacher’s Instruction in Teaching Learning Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v3i2.54Keywords:
Politeness, Requesting, Refusing, InstructionAbstract
This research conducted to describe the request and refusal polite expression when teacher instruct students. The writer has chosen English teacher and the object is 1 teacher. The writer joins in the class and records the activities when teachers teach students. The data analyzed by using qualitative method. The types of politeness are based on the Brown and Levinson’s theory about politeness strategy that should people use when they instruct others. There are 24 male students and 30 female students who are follow this research. The research instrument to collect the data is through observation the conversation during learning and teaching process. All the utterances relate to politeness strategy produced by the students and teacher write down and 2 conversations are chose to be analyzed based on politeness strategies The result of this research shows that there are three types of instructional activities; motivating students (1 expression), informing students of objective (1 expression), helping students recall prerequisites (1 expression), presenting information and example (1 expression) and providing practice and feedback (7 expressions). Teacher used four types of them, Bald on Record (4 expressions), Positive Politeness (16 expressions), Negative Politeness (6 expressions), and off- record (2 expressions). There are 3 expressions are polite requests and no impolite refusal. From that result, the writer concludes that teacher often to use Positive Politeness by reasoning that it types of politeness strategy is to make the relationship between teacher and students more intimate during teaching learning process. This research can lead other researcher to conduct research on Politeness strategy. It also can lead the teachers and the students to make a good interaction by applying the politeness strategy in the classroom so that they can maintain a good communication one anotherDownloads
References
Brown, H. Douglas. 1980. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Brown P, Levinson S. 1987. Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody E (ed.)
Driscoll, M.P. 1994. Psychology of Learning Instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Gagne, Robert M. 1965. The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Grice, H.P. 1975, “ Logic and Conversation”, Syntax and Semantics, Speech Act, 3. New York: AcademyPress
Kasper and Rose,K.R. 2001. Pragmatics in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press
Kimble, Gregory A and Garmezy,Norman. 1963. Principles of General Psychology (2nd ed). New York : The Ronald Press
Leech G, 1993. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman
Locastro, Virginia.1997. Politeness and Pragmatic Competence in Foreign Language Education . Language Teaching Research 1:239-269
Mager, R.F. 1984. Preparing Instructional Objectives (2nd ed). Belmont, CA: Fearon-Pitman
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Smith, Frank. 1975. Comprehension and Learning : A Conceptual Learner
for Teachers. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Andi
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

