Remediating the Writing Performance of Struggling Writers through a Self-regulated Strategy Development Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v5i1.80Keywords:
argumentative writing, remedial writing, struggling writers, writing performanceAbstract
This study explored the writing difficulties of struggling writers and attempted to improve their performance in argumentative writing using Self-Regulated Strategy Development approach (SRSD). Using a diagnostic writing test, 39 senior high school students were identified as struggling writers in a secondary school. The participants were involved in a four-week writing intervention. During the process, they were trained to write using two writing strategies. The scoring of the outputs in the diagnostic and post-tests was mediated by two inter-raters following the criteria on writing performance (Jacobs et al., 1981). Initial results showed that struggling writers tend to perform poorly in all areas of writing performance. But after the intervention, the essay of the participants improved in terms of scores and characteristics. The study further explores the activities that worked during the intervention and the perception of participants towards their writing performance. Finally, implications to teaching argumentative writing to struggling writers are provided based on the intervention process.
Downloads
References
Al Shammari, S. R. (2018). The effectiveness of STOP and DARE in planning and drafting argumentative writing: A case of Saudi college level students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 9 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3151123
Alarcon, J. (2013). Lexical cohesion in student
Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1143481
Belcher, D., & Lukkarila, L. (2011). Identity in the ESP context: Putting the learner front and center in needs analysis. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 73-93). The University of Michigan. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.371075
Castro, C. D. (2004). Cohesion and the social construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024959
Ceque
Ceque
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Observation. Research methods in education, 6, 396-412.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687
Fajriani, A. Z., Listia, R., & Arini, D. N. (2019). The use of
Fearn, L., & Farnan, N. (2008). Classroom instruction for struggling writers In Lenski, S & J Lewis (Eds), Reading success for struggling adolescent learners. The Guilford Press.
Flowerdew, L. (2018). Needs analysis for the second language writing classroom. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0523
Galbraith, J. (2014). The effect of self-regulation writing strategies and gender on writing self-efficacy and persuasive writing achievement for secondary students (Doctoral dissertation). https://repository.wcsu.edu/educationdis/26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rodny Giverson Garcia, Zayda Asuncion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

