Enhancing the EFL Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Text through Think-Pair-Share

Dedi Sanjaya, Lia Agustina


The purpose of tis study was to investigate English as Foreign Language (EFL) students’ achievement in writing skill (descriptive text) through Think Pair Share method. Therefore, the action research design was implemented to match with the purpose of the study. The techniques of collecting the data were writing test, observation, questionnaire, and interview. The result of the study shows that the students’ achievement sustainably improved from the first evaluation, which was 66,4375 to second evaluation, which was 78,125 and to the third evaluation, which was 87,5625. The score continuously improved from the first evaluation to the third evaluation. Observation result shows that the students gave their good attitudes and responses during teaching and learning process by applying the application of TPS (Think Pair Share) method. Questionnaire and interview report shows that students agreed that the application of TPS (Think Pair Share) method had helped them in writing descriptive text. In conclusion, the application of TPS method significantly improved students’ achievement in writing descriptive text.


EFL; Writing; Descriptive Text; Think-Pair-Share

Full Text:



Cooper, Charles R., and Odell, L. (1977). Evaluating Writing. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of English

Deporter, B. and Heracky. M. (2002). Quantum Learning. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa

Evawina S., E. (2010). Theswas of Improving Students’ Achievement on Writing Descriptive Text through the Application of Student Team Achievement Diversion. Medan: State University of Medan

Jolly, D. 1984. Writing Task. New York: Cambridge University

Pardiyono. 2007. Pasti Bwasa! Teaching Genre Based Writing. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.

Oshima, A. and Hogue. 1999. Writing Academic English; Third Edition. United State of America: Addwason Wesley Publwashing Company.

Ransdell, S. and Marie-Laure, B. (2002). New Direction for Research in L2 Writing; Studies in Writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publwasher. Refandi. 2004. Model Penilaian Kelas Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV. Timur Putra Mandiri.

Refandi. 2004. Model Penilaian Kelas Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV. Timur Putra Mandiri.

Reinking, H. A. and Osten, R. (1993). Strategies for Successful Writing; rhetoric, Reader and Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Sharples, M. (1999). How We Write; Writing as Creative Design. London: Routledge.

Slavin, E. Robert. 1995. Cooperative Learning Theory; Research and Practice. New York: The Hopkins University.

Stringer, Ernest T. 2007. Action Research Third Edition. United State of America: Sage Publication Inc.

Sugiyono. (2002). Metode Penelitian Adminwastrasi. Bandung: Alfaeda.

Tinambunan, W. (1988). Evaluation of Student Achievement. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Travers, J. P. (1970). Fundamental of Educational Psychology. Scranton, Pensylvania: International Textbook Company.

Wehmeier, S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary 6th Edition. London: Oxford University Press.

Yelon, S L., Weinstein, G. W. and Weener, P. D. A. (1977). Psychology in the Classroom. Tokyo: Mc Graw-Hill, Inc.

About Descriptive Text in (http://www.ehow.com). Accessed on October, 15th 2017

Cooperative Learning in (http://edtech.kennesaw.edu). Accessed on October, 11th 2017

(http://olc.spsd.sk.ca). Accessed on November, 13th 2017

(www.teachervwasion.fen.com). Accessed on November, 17th 2018

StatisticsArticle Metrics

This article has been read : 37 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 23 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

SALTeL Journal is abstracted and indexed in



Creative Commons License
SALTeL Journal. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.