Text Readability: A Snapshot

Rafizah Mohd Rawian
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v2i1.21

Abstract


Selecting suitable reading materials are taxing and challenging for many English instructors. Text readability analysis can be used to automate the process of reading material selection and also the assessment of reading ability for language learners. Readability formulas have been broadly used in determining text difficulty based on learners’ grade level. Based on mathematical calculations, a readability formula examines certain features of a text in order to provide best rough approximations as an indication of difficulty. This paper reflects some aspects and issues of readability analysis.

Keywords


Text Readability Analysis; Readability Formula; Text Difficulty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armbruster, B., Osborn, J., & Davison, A. (1985). Readability formulas may be dangerous to your textbooks. Educational Leadership, 42(7), 18-20.

Begeny, J. C. & Greene, D. J. (2013). Can readability formulas be used to successfully gauge difficulty of reading materials? Reading in Schools, 00(00), 1- 18.

Chall, J. (1981). Readability: Conceptions and misconceptions [electronic version]. New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/

Crossley, S, Allen, D, McNamara, D. (2011). "Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas N1 English". Reading in a Foreign Language. 23 (1): 86–101.

Dale, E. & Chall, J.S. (1995). Readability revisited: The new dale-chall readability formula. Educational Research Bulletin, 78, 214-223.

Flesch, R.F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233

Fry, E, (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575-578.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S.& Louwerse, M.M (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A.P. Sweet and C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York: Guilford Publications.

Giles, T. D., & Still, B. (2005). A syntactic approach to readability. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 35(1), 47-70.

Klare, G. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University

Mesmer, H. A. E. (2008). Tools for matching readers to texts: Research-based practices. New York: The Guilford Press

Pitcher, B., & Fang, Z. (2007). Can we trust levelled texts? An examination of their reliability and quality from a linguistic perspective. Literacy, 41(1), 43-51.

Root, J. & Stableford, S. (1998). Write it easy-to-read: A guide to creating plain English materials. Health Literacy Centre, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Rubin, A. & Bolt, B. (1981). Conceptual readability: New ways to look at text (Reading Education Report No. 31). Urbana, Illinois: Centre for the Study of Reading. ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service Number ED 208 370.

Rush, R. (1984). Assessing readability: Formulas and alternatives. Reading Teacher. 39(3). 274-283.

Zhihui, F., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53, 587-597



StatisticsArticle Metrics


This article has been read : 17 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 21 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SALTeL Journal is abstracted and indexed in

     

 

Creative Commons License
SALTeL Journal. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.