Developing Digital Rubrics of Six Tasks of KKNI IR 4.0-Based For TEFL Subject

Authors

  • Nora Ronita Dewi Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Masitowarni Siregar Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Anggraini Thesisia Saragih Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v3i1.42

Keywords:

TEFL, Six Tasks of KKNI, Rubrics, R&D

Abstract

This study is aimed at developing rubrics of six tasks of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) the subject of the KKNI Industrial Revolution 4.0-based of an English Education Study Program at UNIMED. The objectives of this research are to analyze the rubrics of TEFL subject used at the 3rd semester of English Education Study Program and develop the appropriate KKNI rubrics based on the students’ needs. This study is mainly focused on developing Critical Book Report, Critical Journal Report, Engineering Ideas, Mini Research, and Projects rubrics. Research and Development applied in this research and the results show that the rubrics used in the 3rd semester at English Education Study Program is developed through implementing the simplification of R&D. The rubrics indicated low competency for the students after analyzing the questionnaires given. New rubrics are designed to answer the needs of the students. Generally, the existing TEFL rubrics are less relevant for the needs of 3rd semester students. In terms of descriptor rubrics, they are not suitable with the needs of the Lesson Plan and the tasks of TEFL rubrics needed by the students are irrelevant for their needs where the topics or contents used in the course book are useful in the learning outcome of this subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nora Ronita Dewi, Universitas Sumatera Utara

English department, Universitas Negeri Medan

Masitowarni Siregar, Universitas Negeri Medan

English department, Universitas Negeri Medan

Anggraini Thesisia Saragih, Universitas Negeri Medan

English department, Universitas Negeri Medan

References

Borg and Gall. (1983). Educational Research an Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.

Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. America: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles-An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. San Francisco: Longman.

BSNP. (2010). Panduan Pengembangan Indikator. Retrieved from https://lugtyastyono60.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/panduan-pengembangan-indikator.pdf

Chennat, S. (2014). Classroom Strategies For Developing English Language Skills In Children With Dyslexia At Elementary Level: An Analytical Study. International journal of research in applied vol. 2, issue 6, june 2014, 27-38

Essossomo, S.M. (2013). The English Language Teaching Enterprise In The Posclonial Cameroom: A Focus On The Framework Of Need Analysis. Basic research journal of education research and review ISSN 2315-6872 Vol 2 (9) pp. 124-133

Harsono. (2005). Pengantar Problem-based Learning. Edisi kedua, Medika-Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Hasan S. Hamid. (2014). Kerangka kualifikasi nasional indonesia (kkni) dan pengembangan kurikulum S2 pendidikan IPA. https://adpgsdindonesia.files.wordpress.com.

June, T. N. C. (2005). Nature Of Curriculum. The Hongkong Institute of Education. Retrieved from www.ied.edu.hl/aclass/

Kusnandar. (2013). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 Suatu Pendekatan Praktis Disertai dengan Contoh. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Liao, Y. Issues Of Validy And Reliability In Second Language Performance Assessment. Columbia university working papers in TESOL applied linguistics 4(2)

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Theorizing About Curriculum: Conception And Definitions. International journal of scholarly academic intellectual diversity, Vol. 13. No. 1

Murray Print, (1992). Curriculum development and design (second edition). Sidney: Allen & Unwin.

Nasution, Teknologi Pendidikan (Jakarta: PT. BumiAksara, 2008), 99

Nunan, David. (1999). Second Lnguage Teaching & Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi

Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, Theodore S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. 2012. Methodology of Quantitative, Qualitative Research, and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

http://www.tugaspedia.com/2017/06/7-tips-dan-trik-cara-mengerjakan-tugas.html

http://edel.staff.unja.ac.id/blog/artikel/Pengertian-Blended-Learning.html

https://www.kajianpustaka.com/2014/06/pengertian-karaktiristik-dan-manfaat-elearning.html

http://e-dufiesta.blogspot.co.id/2008/06/pengertian-e-learning.html

http://www.elearningnc.gov/about_elearning/what_is_elearning/

http://elearning.unpad.ac.id Powered by Joomla! Generated: 4 May, 2009, 01:15

http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pembelajaran_elektronik

Downloads

Published

2020-05-09

How to Cite

Dewi, N. R., Siregar, M., & Saragih, A. T. (2020). Developing Digital Rubrics of Six Tasks of KKNI IR 4.0-Based For TEFL Subject. SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning), 3(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v3i1.42

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.