Communicative Language Preferences in Gen Xs, Millennials and Gen Zs for Workplace Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v7i1.134Keywords:
Generational difference, Workplace Communication, Gen Z, Millennials, Language Preferences.Abstract
This study examined how Generation X (born 1965–1980), Millennials (born 1981–1996), and Generation Z (born 1997–2012) adapt to formal and informal communication in Brunei’s government sector. It was based on Communication Accommodation Theory and Social Identity Theory. These frameworks helped explain how different generations adjust their communication styles. The study used a descriptive survey method. Researchers collected responses from 60 participants working in various government ministries. The findings show that Gen Z and Millennials are more comfortable using messaging apps like WhatsApp for faster daily communication. Gen X still prefers email, memos, and face-to-face conversations, especially for formal purposes. Although technology is already common in many offices, formal communication remains important. This is due to Brunei’s working culture and the influence of Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB). Some Gen Z respondents felt uncertain when speaking with their senior Gen X colleagues. Gen X often finds informal messaging a bit unprofessional. Millennials, on the other hand, are more flexible and can switch between styles depending on who they are communicating with. This study suggests that better intergenerational communication can be achieved by encouraging mentorship between older and younger workers. Offering training for digital communication and building a respectful environment that supports both traditional and modern practices are also beneficial. Overall, the research indicates that combining cultural values with effective communication adaptation is crucial. This helps maintain harmony and productivity in Brunei’s multigenerational government workplaces.
Downloads
References
Al-Hammadi, F. A. A., & Adnan, A. A. Z. (2020). The Moderating Effect of Organisational Culture on the Relationship Between Workplace Learning and Employees
Anderson, J., Kuehl, R. A., Drury, S. A. M., Tschetter, L., Schwaegerl, M., Hildreth, M., Bachman, C., Gullickson, H., Yoder, J., & Lamp, J. (2015). Policies Aren
Ashwan, F. & Mumin, M.A. (2024). A Study on Factors Affecting University Students
Az-Zahra, A., Kumpoh, A., Norkhalbi, S., Wahsalfelah, H., Azam, N., & -Othman, H. (2017). Socio-Cultural Dynamics in Bruneian Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326199909
Bencsik, A., Juh
Daly, R., Diaye, M.-A., & Walkowiak, E. (2019). Does it help to help and to be helped? Impacts of informal help on effort and wages. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 15(2), 302
FEBRIANI, E., LILIWERI, A., RONDA, M., & SURATNOAJI, C. (2023). Government Digital Communication Management in Facing the Health Crisis (Case Study on the Covid-19 Pandemic in Provincial Government). International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(1), 309
Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (2015). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (K. Tracy, T. Sandel, & C. Ilie, Eds.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463
Putro, H. P. (2022). Harmonization of Communication Channels: The Impact of IT Governance on Organizational Interactions. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 1(02), 75
Harwood, J. (2020). Social Identity Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1
Janssen, D., & Carradini, S. (2021). Generation Z Workplace Communication Habits and Expectations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 137
Jeevaratnam, G. A., & Jones, E. (2023). Younger Supervisors
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Basyirah Jefry

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

