Communicative Language Preferences in Gen Xs, Millennials and Gen Zs for Workplace Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v7i1.134

Keywords:

Generational difference, Workplace Communication, Gen Z, Millennials, Language Preferences.

Abstract

This study examined how Generation X (born 1965–1980), Millennials (born 1981–1996), and Generation Z (born 1997–2012) adapt to formal and informal communication in Brunei’s government sector. It was based on Communication Accommodation Theory and Social Identity Theory. These frameworks helped explain how different generations adjust their communication styles. The study used a descriptive survey method. Researchers collected responses from 60 participants working in various government ministries. The findings show that Gen Z and Millennials are more comfortable using messaging apps like WhatsApp for faster daily communication. Gen X still prefers email, memos, and face-to-face conversations, especially for formal purposes. Although technology is already common in many offices, formal communication remains important. This is due to Brunei’s working culture and the influence of Melayu Islam Beraja (MIB). Some Gen Z respondents felt uncertain when speaking with their senior Gen X colleagues. Gen X often finds informal messaging a bit unprofessional. Millennials, on the other hand, are more flexible and can switch between styles depending on who they are communicating with. This study suggests that better intergenerational communication can be achieved by encouraging mentorship between older and younger workers. Offering training for digital communication and building a respectful environment that supports both traditional and modern practices are also beneficial. Overall, the research indicates that combining cultural values with effective communication adaptation is crucial. This helps maintain harmony and productivity in Brunei’s multigenerational government workplaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Basyirah Jefry, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Brunei Darussalam

Centre for Communication, Teaching and Learning, Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB). Her research interests include Workplace Communication, Social Identity and Communication, Communication Research Methods, Public Relations, and Ethics in Communication. Email: basyirahjefry16@gmail.com 

References

Al-Hammadi, F. A. A., & Adnan, A. A. Z. (2020). The Moderating Effect of Organisational Culture on the Relationship Between Workplace Learning and Employees

Anderson, J., Kuehl, R. A., Drury, S. A. M., Tschetter, L., Schwaegerl, M., Hildreth, M., Bachman, C., Gullickson, H., Yoder, J., & Lamp, J. (2015). Policies Aren

Ashwan, F. & Mumin, M.A. (2024). A Study on Factors Affecting University Students

Az-Zahra, A., Kumpoh, A., Norkhalbi, S., Wahsalfelah, H., Azam, N., & -Othman, H. (2017). Socio-Cultural Dynamics in Bruneian Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326199909

Bencsik, A., Juh

Daly, R., Diaye, M.-A., & Walkowiak, E. (2019). Does it help to help and to be helped? Impacts of informal help on effort and wages. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 15(2), 302

FEBRIANI, E., LILIWERI, A., RONDA, M., & SURATNOAJI, C. (2023). Government Digital Communication Management in Facing the Health Crisis (Case Study on the Covid-19 Pandemic in Provincial Government). International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(1), 309

Gallois, C., & Giles, H. (2015). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (K. Tracy, T. Sandel, & C. Ilie, Eds.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463

Putro, H. P. (2022). Harmonization of Communication Channels: The Impact of IT Governance on Organizational Interactions. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 1(02), 75

Harwood, J. (2020). Social Identity Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1

Janssen, D., & Carradini, S. (2021). Generation Z Workplace Communication Habits and Expectations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(2), 137

Jeevaratnam, G. A., & Jones, E. (2023). Younger Supervisors

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396

V7N124-05

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

How to Cite

Jefry, B. (2024). Communicative Language Preferences in Gen Xs, Millennials and Gen Zs for Workplace Communication. SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning), 7(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v7i1.134

Issue

Section

Articles