Interpersonal Meaning of Mangupa Towards Dalihan Na Tolu Tapanuli Selatan in Medan

Irma Khoirot Daulay
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v4i1.63

Abstract


The recent study analyzed the interpersonal meaning of "mangupa" process to obtain the interpretation of language in its function as an exchange of experience. And the interpersonal meaning of the utterances uttered by Dalihan na tolu of Mora, Kahanggi, and Anak boru, show the form of each position and the meaning. This study is qualitative research, which naturally observed the data and analyzed it based on the interpersonal analysis. This research found that the text in mangupa is dominantly realized in statement form. Statements come from giving, information from the source/speaker. And the second is offering; the offer was realized from giving, goods/services from source/ speaker. Mora, kahanggi and anakboru were giving statement in mangupa process of Angkola's wedding ceremony. In addition, these three participants demonstrate their role while Kahanggi as the moderator of the ceremony, anakboru as the helper who takes responsibility for preparing the things needed at every stage of the ceremony, while mora has the authority to provide guidance, suggestion, permission, and rejection at the ceremony.

Keywords


interpersonal meaning; mangupa; dalihan na tolu; Angkola's wedding ceremony

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amri. (2018). An Oral Tradition of Angkola Community. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute- Journal, 1 (21), 51-61

Al Furqan. (2016). Traditional Mariage in Pauh, Padang, West Sumatera. Al-Ta’lim Journal UIN Padang Vol.23 No.1. Retrieved from http://journal.tarbiyahiainib.ac.id/index.php/attalim/article/view/166.

Al-Zubaidi.N.A.G. (2017). Wedding Invitation Genre: Communicating Sociocultural Identities of Iraqi Society. Lublin Studies In Modern Languages And Literature (Online) Vol. 41(1). Retrieved from https://journals.umcs.pl/lsmll/article/view/4012.

Ariady. K & Sumarsih. (2014). Theme and Rheme in “Pepongoten” At Gayo Wedding Ceremony. LINGUISTICA Journal of Linguistics of FBS UNIMED. Vol. 3 No.1. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jalu/article/view/1221.

Arniati.M, Dr. I Gede Budasi.I. G & Ramendra. D.P. (2013). An Analysis of Communication Strategies Used in Ngidih Wedding Ceremony in Sawan Village. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris UNDIKHSHA. Vol.1No.1. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPBI/article/view/5285.

Ary. D, Jacobs.L C & Sorensen CK. (2009). Introduction to Research Education 8th Edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. USA

Cerulo. K.A. (2002). Culture in Mind. London: Continuum.

Eggins. S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, (2nd ed). London: Continuum.

Fairclough, N. (1999). Critical Discourse Analyisis. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.

Nasution, Pandapotan. (2012). Horja Pabuat Boru. Medan: Yayasan Pencerahan Mandailing

Faramarzi.S., Elekaei, A. & Tabrizi, H.H. (2015). Genre-based Discourse Analysis of Wedding Invitation Cards in Iran. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, No. 3 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.25

Halim. A. (2013). Figures of Speech of Ngekhane In Alas Wedding Ceremony. Jurnal Pendidikan TABULARASA. Vol.10 No.2 Retrieved from http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/tabularasa.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold

Halliday, M.A.K.& Hasan R. (1985). Language, context and text; Aspects of Language In A Social Semiotic Perspective. Melbourne. Deakin University.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin J.R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discoursive Power, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K.& Matthiessen. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2009). The Essential. London: Continuum

Jaya, I & Daud, B. (2017). A Discourse Analysis of Melengkan at a Gayonese Wedding Ceremony. SIELE Studies in English Language and Education Journal. (Online). Vol.4 No.1 2017. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/7008.

Joyce, Helen S & Gaudin, J. (2007). Interpreting The Non verbal. Student Workbook, Australia: Phoenix Education

Kress, G. (1988). Communication and Culture: An Introduction. Kensington NSW: New South Wales University.

Krees, G & Leeuwen. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold

Krees, G & Leeuwen. (2006). Reading Images. London: Routledge.

Lubis. I. (2014). Tradisi Martahi Karejo Masyarakat Angkola: Kajian Semiotik. Thesis. USU

Matthiessen. C, Teruya. K & Lam. M. (2010). Key Term in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Miles, M.B and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method s Source book. (3rd ed). America: Sage Publication.

Milner. A. (2002). Re-Imagining Cultural Studies. London: SAGE Publication

O’Halloran, K.L. (2004). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. System Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.

O’Halloran, K.L. (2006). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. System Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.

Rahmah., Sinar, T. S., Meko, A. M & Eddy. S. (2015). Ideational Meaning of Wedding Ceremonyin Deli Malay’s Traditional Culture: A Multimodal Analysis. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), (Online), Vol. 20, Issue2, Ver.1. Retrieved from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol20-issue2/Version-1/E020212229.pdf

Rohmana, F & Ismail, T. (2013). Consumptıon Rıtual In Javanese Weddıng Ceremony: Ethnography Research In Kabupaten Ngawı. Asia-Pacific Management and Business Application Brawijaya University Journal, (Online), Vol.2 No 1. Retrieved from http://apmba.ub.ac.id/index.php/apmba/article/view/151.

Robertson. R. (1977). Eisenstein on The Audionon verbal. King’s College: London.

Rusalic. D. (2009). Making the Intangible Tangible. Belgrade

Surjowati, R. (2021). Exploring interpersonal meanings on the discourse of Indonesian national anthem from the CDA perspectives. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 360-380.

Trompenaars. F, Turner. C.H. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture (2nd ed). London: Nicholas Brealey

Unsworth. L. (2008). Multimodal Semiotics. London: Continuum.

Young. L, Harrison.C. (2004). Systemic Functional Grammar and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.



StatisticsArticle Metrics


This article has been read : 21 times
PDF file viewed/downloaded : 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SALTeL Journal is abstracted and indexed in

     

     

 

Creative Commons License
SALTeL Journal. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.