Exploring University Toilet Signage as a Visual Communication Tool Through a Social Semiotics Lens in Brunei Darussalam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v7i2.162Keywords:
Social semiotics, Nonverbal communication, Visual communication, Toilet signageAbstract
Primarily, the linguistic landscape acts as a foundation for analysing how social, cultural and political structures are reflected in public signs. While previous studies have mainly focused on the linguistic elements and the semiotic principles of visual signs, this research explores how Brunei universities’ toilet signages are analysed and interpreted through a social semiotics approach. By employing convenience, purposive and snowball sampling, the data collected were from seven local and seven international university students' semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion, consisting of the local students only. This study employed a social semiotics approach by Halliday (1978) to analyse the visual findings and to guide the interview data analysis gathered. Three major themes emerged based on the findings, namely: 1) Interpretation and user experience, 2) Cultural encoding in signage, and 3) Cross-cultural interpretation gap. These findings revealed that university students’ cultural background and their familiarity influence their interpretation of the signage. Findings also emphasised the dominant use of English in the signage, which raises questions about Malay visibility and institutional preferences. This study implies that although visuals can be similar, their meaning is not fixed but is shaped by individuals’ cultural and social backgrounds. Although the findings correspond to existing literature, limitations include restricted access only to UTB and UBD signage, which influence the findings of the study. Besides, this study only explored university students from UTB and UBD, which excludes other potential public users and staff who might have a different interpretation of the signages. Hence, it is recommended for future research to explore how toilet signage is interpreted in other institutions and how different demographic groups interpret signage as a visual communication tool to expand the research area for more in-depth findings.
Downloads
References
Alhazmi, A.A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological qualitative methods applied to
the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel educational social contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
Aririguzoh, S. (2022). Communication competencies, culture and SDGs: Effective processes
to cross-cultural communication. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication, 9(96), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01109-4
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity, and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of
complexity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, (pp. 1-23). http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419
Blommaert, J. (2018). Dialogues with Ethnography: Notes on Classics, and How I Read
Them. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099511
Buys, T., Castelejin, D., Heyns, T., & Untiedt, H. (2022). A reflexive lens on preparing and
conducting semi-structured interviews with academic colleagues. Qualitative Health Research, 32(13), 2030-2039. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221130832
Campbell, C., & Olteanu, A. (2023). The challenge of postdigital literacy: Extending
multimodality for a new age. Postdigital science and education, 6, 572-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00414-8
Colker, R. (2017). Public restrooms: Flipping the default rules (Working Paper No. 388).
Ohio State Public Law. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2937718
Coluzzi, P. (2016). The linguistic landscape of Brunei. World Englishes, 35(4), pp. 497-508.
https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12221
Cremaschi, M., Fioretti, C., Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2021). Culture and
policy-making. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71967-8_5
Darras, B. (2016). Semiotics of visual signs and information design. Linguistics, 14(34),
Dewar, R., & Pronin, M. (2023). Designing road sign symbols. Transportation Research Part
F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 94, 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.12.008
Duizenberg, M.R. (2020). Linguistics landscape: A cross culture perspective. Linguistics and
Culture Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v4n1.17
Dunwoodie, K., Macaulay, L., & Newman, A. (2022). Qualitative interviewing in the field of
work and organisational psychology: Benefits, challenges and guidelines for researchers and reviewers. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 863-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apps.12414
Ellestrom, L. (2022). Symbolicity, language and mediality. Semiotica, 2022(247), 1-32.
https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0122
Elmore, K. C., Scull, T.C., & Kupersmidt, J.B. (2016). Media as a “super peer”: how
adolescents interpret media messages predicts their perception of alcohol and tobacco use norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 376-387. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10964-016-0609-9
Felder, M. (2021). Familiarity as a practical sense of place. Sociological Theory, 39(3),
-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211037724
Garg, A., & Dewan, A. (2022). Signage system. Manual of Hospital Planning and Designing.
Springer. (1st ed., pp. 467-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8456-2_45
Ghasemi, S. (2023). A mini review of social semiotic and critical visual studies in language
related fields of study. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, 12(4), pp. 268-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/IJASHSS.2023.383709.1134
Golzer, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience sampling. International Journal of
Education and Language Studies, 1(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162981
Gorter, D., Cenoz, J., & Worp, K.V.D. (2021). The linguistic landscape as a resource for
language learning and raising language awareness. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2021.2014029
Gretzel, U., & Collier de Mendonca, M. (2019). Smart destination brands: Semiotic analysis
of visual and verbal signs. International Journal of Tourism, 5(4), 560-580. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-09-2019-0159
Gualberto, C., & Kress, G. (2019). Social semiotics. In R. Hobbs. & P. Mihailidis (Eds.),
International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy. Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0226
Haji Othman, N.A. (2020). Visualising Change: Linguistic and Semiotic
Landscape of Tutong Town. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), pp. 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SEAMJ-02-2020-B1005
Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Language as Social Semiotic. In J. Angermuller, D. Maingueneau.,
R. Wodak (Eds.), The Discourse Studies Reader: Main Currents in Theory and Analysis (pp. 265-271). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7993009/mod_resource/content/1/DISCOURSE%20STUDIES%20READER%20ANGERMULLER.pdf#page=274
Iftikhar, H., Asghar, S., & Luximon, Y. (2021). A cross-cultural investigation of design and
visual preference of signage information from Hong Kong and Pakistan. The Journal of Navigation, 74(2), 360-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463320000521
Iio, J. (2019). The semiotics of toilet signs. In: M. Kurosu (Ed), Human-Computer
Interaction. Design Practice in Contemporary Societies: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp.285-294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22636-7_20
Iio, J. (2023). The restroom sign database. Human Center Design, 19(1). 57-62.
https://doi.org/10.34404/hcd.19.1_57
Japri, S. (2016). The Language of Shop Signs in a Modern Shopping Centre in Brunei. In
Noor Azam Haji Othman, McLellan, J.A.H. & Deterding, D. (Eds.), The Use and Status of Language in Brunei Darussalam: A Kingdom of Unexpected Linguistic Diversity. Singapore: Springer. Pp. 29-38. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-0853-5_4
Jun, B., H, Fu., & Jin, J. (2020). Are we sensitive to different types of safety signs? Evidence
from ERPs. Journal of Psychology Research and Behaviour Management, 13, pp. 495-505. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S248947
Kellaris, J.J., & Machleit, K.A. (2016). Signage as marketing communication: A conceptual
model and research propositions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2016.v1.i1.a4
Kiger, M.E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide
No.131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), pp. 846-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2020.1755030
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R.Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An
empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23-49. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Leighton, K., Kardong-Edgren, S., Schneidereith, T., & Foisy-Doll, C. (2021). Using social
media and snowball sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy for research. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 55, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.006
Liu, Y. (2020). The negotiation between the predominated sacredness and secular popular
culture in Brunei Darussalam. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEAMJ-02-2020-B1003
Manahova, M.E., Spaak, E., & Lange, F.P.D. (2020). Familiarity increases processing speed
in the visual system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(4), 722-733. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01507
Matwick, K., & Matwick, K. (2022). Comics and humor as a mode of government
communication on public hygiene posters in Singapore. Discourse, Context & Media, 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100590
Matussin, M., Padilla-Valdez, N.& Mumin, M.A. (2025). Audience Insights on Unhealthy F&B Advertisements via Cultivation Theory: A Visual Communication Study. SALTel Journal, 8 (1), pp 19-38. https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v8i1.135
Mehawesh, M. (2014). The socio-semiotic theory of language and translation: An overview.
International Journal of Languages and Literatures, 2(2), 251-269. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_8_June_2014/10.pdf
Meis, J., & Kashima, Y. (2017). Signage as a tool for behavioural change: Direct and indirect
routes to understanding the meaning of a sign. PLoS ONE, 12(8), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182975
Mumin, M. A. (2023). The Application of Code switching, Code mixing, and the need for Bilingual Pedagogy in Brunei Religious (Ugama) Schools: A Qualitative Study Inv olving Generation X and Millennial Teachers. World Journal of English Language, 13(8), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n8p523
Mumin, M.A., Ahmad, A., Yusof, H.N., Rahim, A.& Afdanzian, N.(2025). Communicative Language Attitude and Language Choices of Bruneian Youths, Forum for Linguistic Studies,7(7),540-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9996
Mumin, M. A. (2022). International postgraduates’ perception on Academic Writing: A lesson on criticality. World Journal of English Language, 12(4), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n4p46
Mumin, M. A. (2020). A narrative study of international postgraduate students’ conceptualization of academic writing through assessment feedback in a UK university [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Exeter.
Pesch, A.M. (2021). Semiotic landscape as constructions of multilingualism - a case study of
two kindergartens. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(1), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1928725
Rahman, M.N., & Mehta, V. (2020). Signage form and character. Roads, Interiors, Graphics,
and Research Technology, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2020.v4.i1.a59
Riani, Y.W., Ningsih, A.W., Novitasari, M., & Zulkarnaen, M.S.S.R. (2021). A linguistic
landscapes study in Indonesian sub-urban high school signages: an exploration of patterns and associations. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 5(1), 134-146. https://dx.doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v5i1.2434
Rosendal, T., & Ngabonziza, J.D.D.A. (2022). Amid signs of change: language policy,
ideology and power in the linguistic landscape of urban Rwanda. Language Policy, 22, 73-94. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10993-022-09624-5#citeas
Sabate-Dalmau, M. (2021). ‘Localizing English in town’: A linguistic landscape project for a
critical linguistics education on multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(10), 3580-3596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2067978
Seargeant, P., & Giaxoglou, K. (2020). Discourse and the Linguistic Landscape. In A. D.
Fina, A. Georgakopoulou. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.015
Sehyr, Z.S., & Emmorey, K. (2019). The perceived mapping between form and meaning in
American sign language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: Evidence from iconicity and transparency judgements. Language and Cognition, 11(2), 208-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.18
Shahrin, S.W. (2023). Learning gender in Malay Muslim society in Brunei Darussalam. In L.
Kwen Fee. P.J. Carnegie. & N.H. Hassan (Eds.), (Re)presenting Brunei Darussalam. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6059-8_6
Song, G. (2022). The linguistic landscape of Chinatowns in Canada and the United States: A
translational perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(9), 3505-3523. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2102643
Sonmez, H. (2019). Review of studies focused on bilingualism. Journal of Language and
Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1045-1068. http://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631548
Svennevig, J. (2021). How to do things with signs. The formulation of directives on signs in
public spaces. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, pp. 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.016
Tang, M. (2020). Analysis of signage using eye-tracking technology. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Signage and Wayfinding, 4(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2020.v4.i1.a56
Tishler, C., Assaraf, O.B.Z., & Fried, M.N. (2020). How do visitors from different cultural
backgrounds perceive the messages conveyed to them by their local zoo?. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/8335
Travere, A. (2023). The interplay of signs and visuals: Unveiling the symbiotic relationship
between semiotics and visual communication. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 2(3), 28-40. https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/JLCS/article/view/417
Trisnawati, S., & Sriwarno, A.B. (2018). Visual perception of the depiction of human figures
in pictorial signage of public toilets. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1553325
Ulusoy, N., & Onur, Z. (2023). Visual signs at sociable place entrances: user perceptions and
preferences. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231174418
Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB). (n.d.). Vision and Mission.
https://www.utb.edu.bn/the-university/about-utb/vision-and-mission/
Universiti Teknologi Brunei (UTB). (n.d.). Background.
https://www.utb.edu.bn/library-about/background/
Van Mensel, L., Vandenbroucke, M., & Blackwood, R. (2016). Linguistic Landscapes. In O.
Garcia, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Language and Society. Oxford. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310615699_Linguistic_Landscapes
Vigolo, V., Bonfanti, A., Sallaku, R., & Douglas, J. (2020). The effect of signage and
emotions on satisfaction with the services cape: An empirical investigation in a healthcare service setting. Psychology and Marketing, 37(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21307
Villiers, C.D., Farooq, M.B., & Molinari, M. (2022). Qualitative research interviews using
online video technology - challenges and opportunities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1764-1782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1252
Wan, Y.K.P. (2022). Accessibility of tourist signage at heritage sites: an application of the
universal design principles. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(4), 757-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2022.2106099
Wang, Z. (2025). Carnival rhetoric: resisting absurdity qua absurdist performance.
Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2025.2506797
Yiheng, Z. (2023). Redefining ‘sign’/’symbol’ and semiotics. Signs and Media, 2(1-2), 55-70.
https://doi.org/10.1163/25900323-12340022
Yuan, J., Song, Z., Hu, Y., Fu, H., Liu, X., & Bian, J. (2021). Electrophysiological correlates
of processing warning signs with different background colours: An event-related potentials investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648871
Yusof, B., & Azalie, I. A. (2023). Envisioning translation practice as an industry in Brunei
Darussalam. The 19th International Translation Conference (pp. 416-438). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371123502_Envisioning_Translation_Practice_as_an_Industry_in_Brunei_Darussalam
Zhang, L., Huang, G., Li, Y., & Bao, S. (2021). Quantitative research methods of linguistic
niche and cultural sustainability. Sustainability, 13(17), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179586
Zheng, Y. (2022). Study on the application of Chinese traditional visual elements in visual
communication design. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1020033
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
